
Fútbol Argentino
Instituto struck with little and Boca couldn’t turn it into an advantage despite the dominance
The 2-2 at Estadio Presidente Peron left a clear takeaway: Boca Juniors had more of the ball and created more chances, but Instituto was more direct and found goals at key moments. The final draw reflected a balanced match on the scoreboard, though not in production.
Instituto and Boca Juniors drew 2-2 at Estadio Presidente Peron, in a match that left a clear gap between what each side produced and what ended up in the net. The away team had 69% possession, took 11 shots and generated chances worth 1.8, but could not pull away on the scoreline.
Tactical reading
The overall picture shows a match in which Boca Juniors controlled the ball more and spent more time in the opposition half, but without turning that dominance into a clear advantage in shots. In fact, the numbers were fairly even in that area: 11 shots for Boca against 12 from Instituto, with a slight edge for the home side in shots on target (4 to 3). That helps explain why, even with less possession, Instituto found ways to stay in the game.
In terms of chances created, Boca again came out on top: it generated 1.8, compared with 0.9 for Instituto. That points to one of the key features of the match: the home side was less productive in volume, but more efficient at converting the few chances it had. Instituto, with 31% possession, needed fewer long sequences to hurt Boca and make better use of its moments. Boca, by contrast, had more territorial control, although that possession did not translate into a decisive gap on the scoreboard.
Instituto’s 3-4-2-1 allowed it to settle with less of the ball and find more direct attacks, while Boca Juniors’ 4-2-3-1 matched its greater share of possession and attacking output. The hard data is that the difference in chances created was not large enough to explain a clear lead in the result, and the 2-2 ends up being a fairly accurate summary of a match in which Boca produced more, but Instituto stood firm and responded.
The standouts
The ratings also help frame the analysis:
- Miguel Merentiel (Boca Juniors, 8.1) was the best-rated player in the match and backed that up with his goal in the 56'.
- Enner Valencia (Boca Juniors, 7.9) also had a direct impact on the scoreline with his goal in the 23'.
- J. Galvan (Instituto, 7.2) was the home side’s highest-rated player and justified that mark with his goal in the 48'.
Turning point
The spell that most changed the match was the start of the second half, when J. Galvan made it 2-1 in the 48'. Before that, Instituto had struck first through F. R. Alarcon in the 14', and Boca Juniors responded through Enner Valencia in the 23'. After Galvan’s goal, Boca found the required response through Miguel Merentiel in the 56', leaving the match level once and for all.
Closing
The 2-2 leaves a fairly clear reading: Boca Juniors had more possession and created more, but Instituto protected the result with efficiency and with better stretches for making its chances count. With 12 shots and 4 on target, the home side got more out of its production than a rival that finished with more ball, more chances and the best individual rating in the match, but without being able to turn that superiority into a win.






